[PATCH 2/6] coex: Adding coex includes for coex atom

[Antara Borwankar]

From: Antara <***@intel.com>

Added coex.h which describes the includes of coex atom
---
include/coex.h | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/coex.h

diff --git a/include/coex.h b/include/coex.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9e1ed63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/coex.h
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+/*
+ *
+ * oFono - Open Source Telephony
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ *
+ */
+
+#ifndef __OFONO_COEX_H
+#define __OFONO_COEX_H
+#include <ofono/types.h>
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+#define MAX_BT_SAFE_VECTOR 15
+#define MAX_WL_SAFE_VECTOR 13
+
+enum ofono_wlan_bw {
+ OFONO_WLAN_BW_UNSUPPORTED = -1,
+ OFONO_WLAN_BW_20MHZ = 0,
+ OFONO_WLAN_BW_40MHZ = 1,
+ OFONO_WLAN_BW_80MHZ = 2,
+};
+
+struct Plmnhist {
+ unsigned short mnc;
+ unsigned short mcc;
+ unsigned long tdd;
+ unsigned long fdd;
+ unsigned char bw;
+};
+
+struct ofono_coex;
+
+typedef void (*ofono_coex_bt_active_set_cb_t)(
+ const struct ofono_error *error,
+ void *data);
+
+typedef void (*ofono_coex_wlan_active_set_cb_t)(
+ const struct ofono_error *error,
+ void *data);
+
+typedef void (*ofono_coex_enable_cb_t)(
+ const struct ofono_error *error,
+ void *data);
+
+typedef void (*ofono_coex_remove_cb_t)( const struct ofono_error *error,
+ void *data);
+
+typedef void (*ofono_coex_get_plmn_history_cb_t)(
+ const struct ofono_error *error,
+ int list_size,
+ struct Plmnhist *list,
+ void *data);
+
+struct ofono_coex_driver {
+ const char *name;
+ int (*probe)(struct ofono_coex *coex, unsigned int vendor, void *data);
+ void (*enable)(struct ofono_coex *coex, ofono_coex_enable_cb_t cb,
+ void *data);
+ void (*remove)(struct ofono_coex *coex, ofono_coex_remove_cb_t cb,
+ void *data);
+ void (*set_bt_active)(struct ofono_coex *coex, ofono_bool_t bt_active,
+ ofono_coex_bt_active_set_cb_t cb, void *data);
+ void (*set_wlan_active)(struct ofono_coex *coex,
+ ofono_bool_t wlan_active, enum ofono_wlan_bw wlan_bw,
+ ofono_coex_bt_active_set_cb_t cb, void *data);
+ void (*get_plmn_history)(struct ofono_coex *coex,
+ ofono_coex_get_plmn_history_cb_t cb, void *data);
+};
+
+struct ofono_coex *ofono_coex_create(struct ofono_modem *modem,
+ unsigned int vendor,
+ const char *driver,
+ void *data);
+
+void ofono_coex_ril_lte_band_notify(struct ofono_coex *coex,
+ const char *band);
+void ofono_coex_driver_unregister(const struct ofono_coex_driver *d);
+int ofono_coex_driver_register(const struct ofono_coex_driver *d);
+
+void* ofono_coex_get_data(struct ofono_coex *coex);
+void ofono_coex_set_data(struct ofono_coex *coex, void *data);
+struct ofono_modem *ofono_coex_get_modem(struct ofono_coex *coex);
+
+void ofono_coex_register(struct ofono_coex *coex);
+void ofono_coex_remove(struct ofono_coex *coex);
+
+void ofono_lte_coex_status_notify(struct ofono_coex *coex,
+ ofono_bool_t lte_active);
+
+void ofono_wlan_coex_status_notify(struct ofono_coex* coex,
+ int rx_min, int rx_max, int tx_min,
+ int tx_max, int num_vector, int *vector);
+
+void ofono_bt_coex_status_notify(struct ofono_coex* coex,
+ int rx_min, int rx_max, int tx_min,
+ int tx_max, int num_vector, int *vector);
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
+#endif

[Denis Kenzior]

Hi Antara,

Post by Antara Borwankar
Added coex.h which describes the includes of coex atom
---
include/coex.h | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/coex.h

Since this is going to be Intel modem specific, and will be implemented
inside the modem driver, I don't think we really need a driver
abstraction at all, right? E.g. can't we just send AT commands directly
from the modem driver similar to how ril_intel.c's thermal stuff is done?

Regards,
-Denis